Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nick Tomaino🎩
@nick
PLEASE SHARE https://x.com/ntmoney/status/1822328007991935124?s=46&t=CJb1D8GzV2qvXPeMRuc_Wg
10 replies
14 recasts
56 reactions
Erik
@eriks
spot on, purest form of discovery bc anyone in the world w information can arbitrage
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Solomon đź‘ľEmmanuelđźŽ
@lovethsol
Miss those bangers content champ. Thanks for sharing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
grin
@grin
i get how marketmaking works on an exchange. how does it work for prediction markets? also, polymarket said they had $387m in total volume for all of july, and there's only $180m total bet on the election over all time. you think there's $1.2B of liquidity out there ready to bet the other side?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yashwant🎩
@ywc
2000 $WILD
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
nick i miss your content i’ll only share if you come back here a little bit more
1 reply
0 recast
22 reactions
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
I mean I think the reality is much darker than the seemingly obvious. “Smart money” is pricing in an assassination or election rigging. It’s arguably the probable outcome; I hope it’s not the outcome.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ese 🌳
@esss
Omw 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance
@abundance
But where is "public sentiment" coming from if not from the same " signals" everyone else has (including market signals)? If someone manipulates the market to change sentiment, the market cannot "know" that. It's not omnipotent. Isn't the manipulation a signal like everything else?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
ionspired â——
@ionspired
exactly
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jophiel
@jophiel
There is still not enough liquidity to resist manipulation of 100kk. The total capitalisation of Kamala's bet is 70kk. So if one pour 10kk it might be enough to cause 'short' squiz moving Kamala's win ration upwards
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
