nemb

@nemb

292 Following

158 Followers

nemb pfp

Seems worth it if you had planned to go Asia anyways, and definitely agreed that working together with builders for some period of time yields much superior connection than just roaming conferences. If you spend enough time around in Asia, consider swinging by Saigon in Vietnam. We could organize a few things with local hackers. Ping me up if you do.

1 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

nemb pfp

In an ideal world, of course. There are quite a few builders building good open source tooling out there. And the incentive layer is slowly growing as well. So I guess these things just take time. We have to continue building and promoting the right ethos, and if conjecture goes the right way, it will work out. Honestly I'm personally optimistic about it, and I think we should keep building a healthy ecosystem, and we will build a future in which we could see our children living happily. Part of the issue, I think is that Web3 is still highly divided, and people who don't get Web3 (most of the world) still think it's an unnecessary evil. Compare this to AI where everyone instantly started visualizing sci-fi scenarios (way overblown, at least in the short term), people have a hard time visualizing the long term upside of crypto, and are way under estimating its potential and societal impact. So, with time, conjecture, education and a lot of hard work, we may make this come true. We owe it to our future selves.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nemb pfp

I suspect that the best tool against bots is social signals and automated banhammer tool. I can often tell relatively easily when a bot is, so sending a signal that could be crowd sourced and crowd verified could be a sure shot way to build reliable "bot databases", then automate banning the users that have crossed that threshold on your own account. I personally manually do that extensively, but its painful, and doesn't help anyone else. On the downside, I suppose it would incentivize botters to build "smarter" strategies, but then the "community notes" of sorts would likely catch up, added to the 5 USD upfront cost, most likely it would mitigate widespread bots.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

This is sick 🤯. So cool. I hope it'll take off.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

"Congrats", I think. 🤔😅. But I wonder how can farcaster get rid of bots though...

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Dae pfp

Applications for GG22 OSS Program are still open! ⚡️ Calling all builders and devs. Total matching funds = $1M 🌱 ✨ Donations kick off Oct 23rd ✨ Apply today at grants.gitcoin.co

0 reply

4 recasts

5 reactions

nemb pfp

In Web2, a common technique is to write a good open source tool, give it out for free, most of the time with all the core tools needed, and charge for hosting + premium features. In Web3 you have a few of these too, and a lot of open source but the goal is different. I guess too many projects want to raise funds, make bank, and capture the market. Since it's an early industry (think DotCom bubble-era), it also makes sense from a maturity perspective. I want to believe it is evolving in the good direction.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nemb pfp

Depends on what you do. o1 is honestly awful for quite a few things. Nemotron pretty good at a few things (especially if you CoT-prompt it like o1 does). Sonnet 3.5 still king for code. Qwen2.5-coder, Deepseek-Coder V2 16B, Codegeex in the open source category if you don't need a too large scope.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nemb pfp

Probably an attempt at market capture / the "investors expectations disease" (in reference to the Dutch disease), whereby they do things to justify a certain valuation, not really to solve a particular problem. On the flipside, some good probably comes out of it. New users, new techniques, new technologies, it's not all bad.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nemb pfp

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

nemb pfp

How would you see monetization working in such case?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

nemb pfp

Exactly. If there's no live product but the beta version is revolutionary and potential is huge, then the valuation can be pretty high. A counter point is that raising the value too high too early is counterproductive for future raises. No one will want to invest if they risk a down round in upcoming raises.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

Cost bundling is something that's been on my mind for a while. Going to be very interesting to watch how it goes.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

Maybe are just in a plateau of lenient potential, playing around with the meta ideologies of recent times, implementing them, and slowly discovering new meta ideologies in the making that may appear in a few years or maybe decades?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

Increases the odds, for sure. But just by a little bit. 😉

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nemb pfp

1inch or Rainbow. Ambire.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

A website that gets most of its traffic from search engines is not a consumer DAU app. Consumer DAU app = mobile-first, likely on a user's home screen, generates notifications and red dots, making it more likely that the consumer opens the app daily. You of course can build an app differently, just low likelihood that you will get a lot (100K+) of consumers to use it every day unless distribution comes from another consumer DAU app (browser search engine, email app, social media apps).

12 replies

11 recasts

112 reactions

timbeiko.eth pfp

Are there are governance/legal systems who systematically keep track of the costs/externalities of their rulesets and default to removing/changing rules if they are proven to be a net negative? Not “we realized that this is bad and campaign to change it”, but built in proactively.

5 replies

2 recasts

30 reactions