Lulu on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

If we decided on using client incentives, we should at least stay consistent with it. The only stat that really matters here is whether anyone is actually using the client, and that comes from onchain client incentive records, which I don’t see mentioned in this proposal. If no one’s using Nouns Terminal, what’s the point of funding it further? And if they are using it enough, aren’t the current rewards doing the job? If they’re not, shouldn’t we be looking to increase the incentives instead of just reverting back? We put nearly a million into Verbs this year, and as far as I know, the only thing they’ve fully delivered is client incentives, which, if this is the outcome, seem pointless.

3 replies

1 recast

4 reactions

醓 pfp

I'd say as a counter to all this that Yuki was not around (I think?) for the 25e fundraise that happened prior. Entire 9e going to the intern, seems like a decent precedent + shows a level of awareness / willingness to listen from the nouns sh team rather than another 200k ask.

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

0x4b1d pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

W1NTΞR pfp

Usage ≠ won bids. The client can provide value to Nouns even if nobody uses it to bid. E.g. the Terminal shows a bunch of info other clients don't, like multiple auctions, clients used, balance changes, profile, stats, etc. We are also very transparent with our analytics: https://stats.nouns.sh/share/iNRTi5xKcW5QJRAM/nouns.sh. I don't know if 250 users/mo is high or low, I'd love to see how it compares to other clients.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction