Lulu

@nekofar.eth

336 Following

1643 Followers

Lulu pfp

I was curious about the recent DUNA proposals, but it looks like the actual DUNA board decided and announced that so early. I guess I’m not going to vote to make it more legitimate, so nothing to wonder about anymore. 🤔🤷‍♂️

0 reply

1 recast

8 reactions

Lulu pfp

New year, new cycle. Time to build, experiment, and maybe mess things up a bit. Let’s see what these 12 months have in store! 🚀✨

1 reply

1 recast

10 reactions

Lulu pfp

Happy holidays, everyone! 🎄🕎✨ Whether it's Christmas, Hanukkah, Yalda, or just a well-earned break from the chaos, I hope you're surrounded by good vibes, warm moments, and absolutely no bugs (IRL or in your code). Stay connected, whether onchain or otherwise, and enjoy the season. Cheers to keeping it real and chill! 🍵

0 reply

1 recast

9 reactions

Lulu pfp

Critics aren’t responsible for offering solutions or making their criticism constructive. Criticism should be fair game in any field, whether it comes with solutions or not. Ignoring criticism just because it doesn’t spoon-feed fixes? That’s a lazy cop-out and a fallacy, shifting the focus from what’s being said to how it’s said. 🤷🏻‍♂️

1 reply

4 recasts

15 reactions

Lulu pfp

What if we could duplicate an existing proposal or candidate into a new draft? Copy the content and transactions, and then just tweak it as needed. Not sure how much it'd get used, but it doesn’t seem like it’d be too complicated to implement. 🤔

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

Lulu pfp

I’m all for autosave on everything. Feedback included. No exceptions. 😹

0 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

Lulu pfp

Some proposal states lack transactions and transaction hashes, so there's no need for Etherscan links.

1 reply

1 recast

5 reactions

Lulu pfp

@supriyo.eth Where exactly did I sound jealous when talking about making this space more competitive? Did you just sidestep that point entirely? Every time I mention client incentives, it’s like clockwork: "Well, others are already getting overpaid, so we’ve got a precedent." And I’m sitting here like, "Sure, that was relevant in the Jurassic era, but now we’ve got actual ways to progress." 😹

1 reply

2 recasts

14 reactions

Lulu pfp

One of the funny things about Nouns is how being “Nounish” is supposed to mean doing good without expecting anything in return. But if you look closer, it’s like a Where’s Waldo trying to spot a Nounder who’s actually done anything unpaid. These folks are stacking up Nouns, cashing checks, and leading some of the biggest spending sprees around here. And now, the plan is to go non-profit, or as some clever souls are calling it, noun-profit. Get amusing by this show, it’s redefining “charity work,” huh? Sorry for not being Nounish enough to keep this talk behind closed doors. 😹

2 replies

3 recasts

5 reactions

Lulu pfp

Getting closer to feeling like a corporation run by board members, while the rest of us are just small shareholders. For now, we still have a voice, but who knows about the future. I've seen some wild ideas floating around; like muting voters.

1 reply

3 recasts

15 reactions

Lulu pfp

For those not familiar with the concept of Client Incentives, check out this article by Verbs on how it all works and how you can get involved: https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/I5KgKbcJBjROn4KR_Ks9VcAuQXYUUHwkzGiX0gFbtME

0 reply

0 recast

11 reactions

Lulu pfp

Inviting @pingfeng because why not. 🤔

3 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

Lulu pfp

If we decided on using client incentives, we should at least stay consistent with it. The only stat that really matters here is whether anyone is actually using the client, and that comes from onchain client incentive records, which I don’t see mentioned in this proposal. If no one’s using Nouns Terminal, what’s the point of funding it further? And if they are using it enough, aren’t the current rewards doing the job? If they’re not, shouldn’t we be looking to increase the incentives instead of just reverting back? We put nearly a million into Verbs this year, and as far as I know, the only thing they’ve fully delivered is client incentives, which, if this is the outcome, seem pointless.

3 replies

5 recasts

6 reactions

Lulu pfp

Alright, so here's what I'm seeing, Nouns Terminal was already funded with at least 25 ETH, right? Kinda odd that this isn't mentioned in the proposal. Plus, it's been open-sourced for a few months now. Even though it says the project is open for self-use, I'm still wondering, I noticed there’s no license on the project that clarify that, without a license it could not be used legally in a lot of jurisdiction and ethically I assume everywhere. https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/676

3 replies

3 recasts

12 reactions

Lulu pfp

Some projects thrive without traditional revenue streams, purely because of strong community backing. Wikipedia, for instance, relies on donations and volunteer efforts but remains one of the most visited sites globally thanks to its active editors. Similarly, open-source software like Linux and Apache are kept alive by passionate contributors without needing a “sustainable” revenue model. If Nouns hasn’t achieved this level of community over the years, that points to a clear gap in their community-building efforts.

1 reply

2 recasts

7 reactions

Lulu pfp

I was reading something, stumbled upon this, and thought, this is some people's story. The pride in "nothing" shouldn't be traded for "little." "Little" is like an addiction, it taints you, makes you scared, makes you cling to it. After a while, you'll accept any humiliation just so they don't take even that from you. It clips your wings.

0 reply

3 recasts

15 reactions

Lulu pfp

It’s all theater. If you take a closer look at VWRs, they reveal more truth than any of the numbers ever will. It’s theater because things are done without any real accountability, no matter how or by whom.

1 reply

3 recasts

18 reactions

Lulu pfp

They’ll sidestep the rules, putting on a show like they care about law and order, but deep down, it’s all about grabbing power. Then they’ll just shrug off their little resource grab, acting like nothing’s wrong—waiting for us to go along with it and pretend we didn’t notice. 🤷🏻‍♂️

2 replies

1 recast

18 reactions

Lulu pfp

The point is, we need to raise the cost of these moves instead of pretending it’s all good. They’ve pulled this before, and it’s up to us to make sure everyone knows. That the least we can do. 🤔

0 reply

1 recast

8 reactions

Lulu pfp

I've noticed there's an issue with the Voting Overview modal when rendering revotes.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions