Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/subset
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
"In our current state, saving, sharing and search are presented as activities uniquely aspected to the particular platforms we happen to exist upon at that moment in time. In the coming state, however, saving, sharing and search regain their fundamental, platform-agnostic nature and are revealed as protocolised activities that thrive on user and content migration. Naturally, the incumbents have no interest in helping the coming state arrive any sooner than absolutely necessary. Mostly because the value derived from the coming state of saving, sharing and search accrues to the end user themselves, instead of being captured wholly by the platform providers acting as greedy and unnecessary intermediaries. But arrive it shall." https://paragraph.xyz/@subset/penalised-by-platforms
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
na
@na
https://warpcast.com/na/0xc89e909c
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
Don't think I get what's meant by extension-only tbh. No-feed social flow is really localised-feed only driven by proximity of the feed emitters based on some parameter/metric?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
na
@na
can it be solved using only chrome extensions? no-feed is more like a test where over half of a random selection will answer “this is not a feed”
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
Intuition says yes, can be solved via Chrome ext. only. However, there needs to be something of sufficient sophistication (and generality!) for the extension daemon to pull from and push to, and a real tight UX for anything beyond the scope of the daemon's push/pull.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
