Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's another way to look at the spam filtering problem. Consider this hypothetical? 1. Let's say you have a new account on the network (Account A) at they reply 100 times to the same account (Account B) with no engagement back. 2. It doesn't actually matter if Account A is run by a human or a bot with AI. 3. If you have 1000 accounts like Account B, Account A will just stop using the app. They'll move to another network or a messaging app. 4. Ideally, Account B would reply thoughtfully a few times and Account A engages with them, and then it increases over time as they build a relationship. 5. If you say "well 100 times is too much, but 50 times is fine", then you're admitting humans can be spammy and we're now arguing over the definition. 6. Side note: I don't think anyone is ready for a world where bots powered by AI are as interestingā€”or even more interestingā€”than humans.
26 replies
1 recast
60 reactions

moonbag.degen.eth šŸŽ©šŸ’… pfp
moonbag.degen.eth šŸŽ©šŸ’…
@muffinlovr
Yeah but your default is priority mode so Account A probably canā€™t even see Account B I want warpcast to succeed so badly but right now your shit is busted.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction