Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew McDowell-Sweet pfp
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
Surprise minimisation as described by active inference got me thinking. Is what separates curators from consumers/creators the orientation towards surprise? Most display aversion to surprise while others seek and solve for it. In that case, curation equals surprise maximisation. https://warpcast.com/msms/0xada0182e
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Sjlver pfp
Sjlver
@sjlver
This got me thinking. Thanks a lot! I like the classification into consumers, creators, and curators. Even if I don't think that surprise maximization is the right analogy for curators... they organize and systematize. This helps them and their peers make sense of the world (ie, minimize their surprise). WDYT?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Sjlver pfp
Sjlver
@sjlver
Maybe it helps to think of this as an "explore/exploit trade-off" (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration-exploitation_dilemma) Consider someone who recently moved to a new city. It makes sense to explore, to try new restaurants frequently -- a curator behavior. VS for someone who knows the town well, it is better to use one's experience, to visit the favorite restaurants most often -- a consumer behavior. It's the same person, but they are at a different stage in life, where the optimal amount of "surprise" is different.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Matthew McDowell-Sweet pfp
Matthew McDowell-Sweet
@msms
Yeah, good way to frame it. But it doesn’t seem like the explore mode switch ever gets entirely switched off. It’s always on, running in the background and waiting for an appropriate trigger. I’d probably lean towards it being more a way of being than a mode. Like a sticky setpoint for openness to experience.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction