maurelian
@maurelian.eth
We know that Superchain interoperability is hard to explain, but we're too close to the problem to know why. We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to read this, and tag @zain to complain about what's unclear to you. https://docs.optimism.io/stack/protocol/interop/explainer
4 replies
4 recasts
9 reactions
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Hey Maurelian do you remember the CSR proposal for optimism?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
CSR? No, my memory fails me there. Or perhaps you mean CRS?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Nah fam, contract secured revenue. paying back sequencer fees to contracts that drive txs. Using gas usage is flawed as it incentivizes bad contracts. If you have Sybil, then you can use active unique users to pay out. Would be huge, who can I talk to at optimism to make this happen? Karl?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
IIRC @kelvin and @gonna have both looked into it at one point? Also @msilb7 will definitely be interested in anything anti-Sybil
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Silberling
@msilb7
RetroPGF round 4 attempted to distribute rewards based on onchain metrics. But pro/con to everything imo
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrangodamus - bank/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
What metrics were considered?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
