memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
I'm late to the party, but ethscriptions are really interesting. The possibility of having "contractless" functionality is the thing that really captures my imagination... it seems like you need not just data, but a way to describe its schema. Anyone working on this?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
I've been playing with hex-encoding data using a brief front matter that takes inspiration from the Foundry approach to ABI encoding, but by the time you encode the body to hex, append `data:application/octet-stream,` and then convert that all to hex, it ends up being pretty lengthy.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
Maybe dynamically typed JSON is sufficient? Or perhaps using JSON Schema would be simpler even if it's very verbose?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
ultimately, what I'd like is that if "the application" lives off-chain while "the data" lives on-chain, applications should be able to introspect the data to know whether they can operate on it. This would allow standards to emerge.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
You could definitely get that through structured JSON and it seems like some usages of ethscriptions are going down this path currently. Unfortunately, this means that you can't really have portions of your application on-chain though, since reading JSON from any EVM-compatible language would be prohibitively expensive
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes du monde 🎩 pfp
memes du monde 🎩
@mrmemes.eth
I'm seeing a lot of plain text ethscriptions coming through... currently there are a number that look like this: https://ethscriptions.com/ethscriptions/0xcc14844ea6b93e1ec40f552f4c71f6ef9b9263d39aaca3f44a809f27970e65d0
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction