Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monteluna
@monteluna
Idea: they should never launch Berachain. It's got a $2.3B TVL without a functioning chain. The moment they launch, then they'll start measuring real revenue, flows, then it's valuation becomes a hard number. Right now, it's pre-revenue. It has no valuation. It's market cap is somewhere between infinity and zero. Why ruin it?
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
I. Christwin〔▸‿◂〕💡
@ichristwin.eth
😅 I mean, you might end up doing the same if you've had to deal with this tweet nagging at the back of your mind. https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/940744724431982594
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Monteluna
@monteluna
Cami and the gang should just turn it into a lifestyle brand where the team, protocol, and users just vibe forever on the chain that will never launch. - It gets the team dealflow and access to cool parties and networking. - Berachain depositors never realize losses (tokens are locked indefinitely until mainnet launch, so they're basically locked forever). - Protocols have a perpetual project and can leverage it to continued funding rounds, and can always point to Boyco TVL growth as justification for more runway. Why ruin the fun at this point?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
↑langchain 🎩
@langchain
VCs need to raise more funds before they release the chain. Infinite money glitches rn
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
I. Christwin〔▸‿◂〕💡
@ichristwin.eth
😨 ohh wow this actually does make sense and also sounds awfully familiar. XRP? or rather Pi? I'm pretty sure there's a team out there that's getting away with doing this.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
