Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Monokai pfp
Monokai
@monokai
Me: "Hi, I make Generative Art" Everyone: "Cool, me too, look what I made with Midjourney" So that's why I've been using the term Algorithmic Art for code-driven Generative Art lately, as opposed to AI-assisted Generative Art. And tried to define it: https://monokai.com/articles/algorithmic-art-as-a-subset-of-generative-art
9 replies
2 recasts
23 reactions

Marius Watz pfp
Marius Watz
@mariuswatz
Already seen AI artwork labeled simlly as “generative art”, so I applaud the effort. My concern would be that algorithmic art sounds even more dry? I’ve played with rule-based / aleatory, parametric immediately sounds like math class. 😅 50 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Ethspresso 🚌🔵🎩 pfp
Ethspresso 🚌🔵🎩
@ethspresso.eth
Important topic and great article! In some ways it's not too late to rebrand what we're doing here, if enough artists agree on a new term. I've used "code-based art" when talking with people that are not in the space. This conveys the essence and is easy to grasp, I think. "Algorithmic art" is more precise though.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

AutoEclectus 🦜 pfp
AutoEclectus 🦜
@autoeclectus
Agree! I’ve been using the term algorithmic art or code-based art to describe my work. Feels more accurate. @williamapan uses “code paintings” which I like a lot too!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Eduxdux pfp
Eduxdux
@eduxdux
Interesting text, Im happy to see people talking about it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Luka →{protocell:labs}← 🎩 pfp
Luka →{protocell:labs}← 🎩
@luka
Yeah I know exactly what you mean! The term “generative” was always ill defined imo, later appropriated for gen AI creations. Now we are really stuck. I like your suggestions! 50 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Irina Liakh 🎩 pfp
Irina Liakh 🎩
@irinaliakh
111 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

aerique pfp
aerique
@aerique.eth
765 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

panik 👾 pfp
panik 👾
@panik
Mine is "computational art".
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DaDaBoBo pfp
DaDaBoBo
@dadabobo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nik.Vct pfp
Nik.Vct
@nikvct
Interesting note. I think it is 71 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction