Varun Srinivasan
@v
ENS names are going through an interesting phase. Original vision was one name everywhere, but L1 got too expensive so people have offchain ENS (farcaster) and L2 ENS (base names, world names). The natural progression seems to be towards multiple ENS namespaces - is this a net good thing?
28 replies
196 recasts
540 reactions
mmu
@mmu
Pretty much have .eth domain be the universal account that lives on L1. And have all the subdomains ENS belong to each L2. .eth —> Ethereum (universal account) .base.eth —> Base .op.eth —> Optimism .arb.eth —> Arbitrum .pol.eth —> Polygon .zk.eth —> zkSync Sending a transaction to a specific subdomain will bridge those funds to its respective L2.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
