Iiigfffjj🎭⚡️

@mmmkkl

94 Following

24 Followers

Jonny Mack pfp

21 replies

157 recasts

481 reactions

Ryan pfp

Fun thought snack from SICP: Allowing quotation in a language wreaks havoc with the ability to reason about the language in simple terms, because it destroys the notion that equals can be substituted for equals. For example, three is one plus two, but the word “three” is not the phrase “one plus two.” Quotation is powerful because it gives us a way to build expressions that manipulate other expressions (as we will see when we write an interpreter in [[Chapter 4]]). But allowing statements in a language that talk about other statements in that language makes it very difficult to maintain any coherent principle of what “equals can be substituted for equals” should mean. For example, if we know that the evening star is the morning star, then from the statement “the evening star is Venus” we can deduce “the morning star is Venus.” However, given that “John knows that the evening star is Venus” we cannot infer that “John knows that the morning star is Venus.”

0 reply

8 recasts

11 reactions

jacob pfp

to reach higher ground you must first climb

2 replies

3 recasts

55 reactions

Jayme Hoffman pfp

lol nice comeback https://x.com/_mattwelter/status/1850314572172763318

0 reply

0 recast

22 reactions

welter pfp

guys how the hell did my tweet get so much traction

12 replies

18 recasts

128 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

14 replies

160 recasts

508 reactions

July pfp

A lot of art, and philosophy and things like this comes from questioning the world, deeply and challenging conventions. For example, wanting to express something about how sweatshops are causing terrible harm and you buying H&M or Zara for example -- and wanting to make art about it, in some way might come from a deep need to understand where your clothes actually comes from There is this inquisitive nature, or a larger perspective of the world is not always the most compatible imo with deep engineering, because you need to be more enamored by the deep rabbit whole that the physical universe, or the digital universe is, in some ways. So more often than not, you either don't have the time, or the opportunity to deeply look into these things. Every time a new technology is introduced, we often have to speed run economic systems and political systems because paradigm shifts then we are societally forced to figure out the interplay of economic / political agents all over again, i.e. consequences of the tech

1 reply

0 recast

31 reactions

July pfp

I remember I had the opposite problem. When I started first learning how to program when I was about ~13 yrs old or so, I remember having a difficult time. The difficulty wasn't in knowing what a variable was, that it was memory somewhere on the computer saved at an address somewhere, while I didn't know exactly what that meant, I had enough of an understanding to grok it enough to use it. What I didn't understand was, what was a variable, and was, why was it called a variable, and how do variables work in the world, why did they choose it, who made it and kept going down a rabbit hole. In other words, engineering inherently requires you to almost suspend this rabbit hole about diving into the philosophy and larger societal implications about what these things, and the consequences, and how it challenges norms, and disrupts notions of traditional representations of concepts, or what the philosophical meaning is -- if you don't suspend you dont get to the next step

4 replies

6 recasts

63 reactions

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp

jesse.base.eth 🔵

come meet me and the team in person https://warpcast.com/base/0x0f09101c

2 replies

8 recasts

405 reactions

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp

jesse.base.eth 🔵

starting friday, I'm spending november meeting based builders around the world. nairobi bangalore bangkok singapore manila if you're in one of these cities, I want to meet you and learn how we can help you bring the world onchain.

19 replies

126 recasts

873 reactions

Iiigfffjj🎭⚡️ pfp

Iiigfffjj🎭⚡️

I don't think I know how to give up. But now I know that there is something which is out of your control. It is not you who don’t give up, it is that you can never seize it.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

July pfp

I would personally be more interested in human curated casts, though if someone wants to do AI curated, not going to stop them

1 reply

1 recast

27 reactions

July pfp

An idea: A well designed physical book of selected casts this past year from /July channel

15 replies

21 recasts

189 reactions

dylan pfp

that’s crazy 😂😂😂

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

jacob pfp

hi @aethernet what’s something I should know based on all of my previous casts. a hidden insight or thread that I’m not aware of.

0 reply

3 recasts

118 reactions

jihad ↑ pfp

This conversation fundamentally reshaped how I think about the relationship between humans and AI.

1 reply

1 recast

21 reactions

July pfp

One of the hallmarks of people that “I find to be cool” (solely opinion is my own) is this ability to transverse different domains, in a generally unpredictable (or unexpected) often because they follow their interests and these different facets of themselves are expressed without judgement across different domains

2 replies

3 recasts

78 reactions

July pfp

So — in many ways you can be quite skilled and very knowledgeable in one arena, and have little to if not absolute deficiency in another area. People also assume that as you become more successful that you are quite balanced in many arenas, and I think this is absolutely not the case

6 replies

105 recasts

257 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

dodgers baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lfg!!!!

3 replies

0 recast

18 reactions

jesse.base.eth 🔵 pfp

jesse.base.eth 🔵

if you're a builder or agent building with AI on @base, what can we do to help you? has been so exciting seeing luna, @virtualsprotocol.eth, @aethernet take off — want to help accelerate however we can.

19 replies

120 recasts

547 reactions