Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
This old slatestarcodex post is fascinating to revisit in the context of everything that has happened in the 7 years since it was written: https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/07/25/how-the-west-was-won/
6 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Since the first time I read the post, I've probably become somewhat less confident in the idea that high-entropy cultures are almost always better. And I feel like that's a common update coming out of recent trends: trumpism and wokeness have both proven themselves high-entropy, and it's kinda hard to approve of both.
13 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Isn‘t the high entropy Coke example misleading? „Dalai Lama bans Coke (high-e) over milk (low-e)“ To me that makes it sound like Coke is such a great drink that it establishes itself. But this is false. In Tibet, milk is (high-e) through tradition and Coke needs marketing energy https://i.imgur.com/DoPlblW.jpg
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
mk
@mk
Take 10 Tibetan kids. Let them choose a cup of milk or Coke. You'll be left with 9-10 cups of milk.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
- I loved Coke as a kid too. I haven‘t had it in years now. Unhealthy and too sweet. Don‘t like taste - You assume perfect distribution of Coke equal to milk. But Tibetans have yaks and no source of Coke. So you have to expense energy for Coke to be there. The yaks are just gonna reproduce and give milk.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
mk
@mk
Sure, I don't drink it anymore either. But in this scenario, even without equal distribution, the demand for Coke will be higher than milk in any given situation, and thus, providing Coke will be preferentially rewarded so its distribution will grow.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
