Miles Jennings pfp

Miles Jennings

@milesjennings

147 Following
1518 Followers


Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
8 recasts
38 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
10 recasts
87 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
4 recasts
25 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
3 recasts
34 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
0 recast
12 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
4 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
19 recasts
77 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
8 recasts
20 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
8 recasts
37 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
1 reply
4 recasts
17 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
2 replies
5 recasts
25 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
4 replies
13 recasts
59 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
The critical takeaway here isn't about memecoins. It's that the SEC's interpretation of Howey continues to be that an investment contract may exist based on the "economic reality" of an arrangement. The SEC's recent optimistic approach to the industry and the dismissal of many of its cases has led a lot of people to believe that "everything is legal". That's particularly true because most of the cases the SEC has been dropping/settling involved arguments by the defendants that, rather than "economic reality," Howey's investment contract analysis hinged on whether there was a formal contract. So, if the dismissals were a sign that the SEC was accepting of this "predicate contract" argument (and abandoning the "economic reality" argument), nearly every token in existence would be legal. This release confirms the SEC doesn't believe "everything is legal" and that's a good thing.
9 replies
18 recasts
99 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
4 recasts
24 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
5 recasts
53 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
17 recasts
69 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
5 replies
20 recasts
179 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
0 reply
6 recasts
10 reactions

Miles Jennings pfp
3 replies
14 recasts
55 reactions