Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
How much platform risk is a founder taking by building on Farcaster? Very significant iyam... The full article is also a great read: https://medium.com/@lucarestagno/ive-sold-my-4th-saas-as-a-solopreneur-the-backstory-4e6195c305be
5 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Dan Finlay ๐ŸฆŠ pfp
Dan Finlay ๐ŸฆŠ
@danfinlay
Biggest platform risk rn imo is probably from depending on proprietary apis/indexes. Everything else is technically open, but if you need to get off them at some point, it might just be too much work to keep you nimble and in business.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samo pfp
Samo
@samo.eth
Yes, exactly: what if the API becomes private. And itโ€™s not that theyโ€™d do it NOW; but itโ€™s a risk, same as it was with Twitter: bye bye clients.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Mentat ๐Ÿน pfp
Mentat ๐Ÿน
@mentats.eth
It is the crucial point. Even now, the protocol is permissionless, but the actual infrastructure to build Frame is centralized. Accordingly, devs suffer integrity issues. I put my best effort to build permissionless layer for permissionless data layer for FC
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samuel ใƒ„ pfp
Samuel ใƒ„
@samuellhuber.eth
Which part of the frame infra is most centralized? Frames to me are actually fine. Clients is where youโ€˜re stuck in Warpcast dependency hell
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction