Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
How does crypto fit into leftist ideology/worldview? I’ve always seen it as a “libertarian” technology
5 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Law❦︎ pfp
Law❦︎
@traguy.eth
Well… By encouraging decentralised power, financial inclusivity, and a reduction in corporate control, cryptocurrency can be in line with socialist principles. It can promote economic equality and community empowerment…. it's not just for libertarians.
1 reply
0 recast
14 reactions
rathermercurial pfp
rathermercurial
@rathermercurial.eth
This question asserts a false binary between "Leftist" and "Libertarian". "Libertarian" views are anti-authoritarian, and span the left/right political spectrum. "Leftist" views are anti-capitalist (mutualist) and span the authoritarian/libertarian spectrum. These axes form the popular "political compass" model. "Leftist" and "Libertarian" aren't contradictory points of view. In fact, there's an entire quadrant of the political compass for that intersection. According to stated values (not politics), the highest proportion of people are both slightly left and slightly libertarian, making it the most common worldview. There are both libertarian mutualist (regen) and libertarian capitalist (degen) implementations of crypto running side by side on any given network, sometimes composed into hybrid systems as seen in ReFi and elsewhere. The real question we should ask is "How does crypto fit into an authoritarian worldview?", where "authoritarian" means monopoly of access to systems of power (CeFi/CBDCs)
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Britt Kim pfp
Britt Kim
@brittkim.eth
I don't think of it as a libertarian technology--mostly because I'm one of several bitcoin core contributors that isn't libertarian. If you hold suspicions of centralized financial systems and government control of money, that's plenty.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ambire Wallet pfp
Ambire Wallet
@ambirewallet
Every technology should be politically neutral.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Andi pfp
Andi
@0xandi
To me it's far beyond access to and replication of today's limited utility financial system. I don't see much value in the WAGMI narrative that everyone (or even a majority of stakeholders) can get rich, as this only works in la la land, or phrased differently: only under extreme abstraction from reality, ignoring very real boundaries. In reality the financial instruments on crypto rails will do the exact same biddings as they did in tradfi, because they have or breed the exact same lords. The appeal to me is governance. MakerDAO phrases it as "governance is the endgame". I'd put it as a starting point for an entirely new game. Governance has seen the least innovation in the last centuries compared to all other bodies of social science, yet it touches every aspect of human (and sadly, non-human) life. Incorruptible, reliable, programmatic, transparent, participatory, efficient. All these attributes can be achieved now in governance and were never operationally feasible at scale before
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction