McBain
@mcbain
I'm pretty obsessed with how clanker fees can be a whole new kind of business for people
5 replies
1 recast
18 reactions
not parzival
@shoni.eth
don't you mean pool feels? or okay genuine question once the hype passes how can anyone justify paying 60% equity fee for a service business like i just don't see this model working for business but definitely did for meme coins or accidental projects
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
McBain
@mcbain
this feels like "why pay for vercel when you can just host it yourself" because people don't want to have to do stuff What businesses do you mean? Can you give an example? Also I think memecoins can be 1000X bigger than they are now, to the point that the world doesn't understand how we functioned without them
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival
@shoni.eth
not sure that's true when the difference of implementation is posting "launch with vercel" or "launch with vorxel" for example, any business that operates effectively wouldn't pass the majority equity of revenue over. atlas token or any other project/hopeful business where revenue is primarily pool fees or initial token sales (from the pool) -- it's like saying give clanker 60% of your initial token sales plus equity forever and sale(s) risk? for a business, i think clanker is more like a 5% equity "incubator" to get a token off the ground better.. and that's token equity only so now we get into meta for "memecoins" "project coins" "business" "investing" etc... i.e. is atlas a memecoin @jrf ?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions