Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cryptoart
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Introducing the /cryptoart channel DAO https://paragraph.xyz/@mxjxn/announcing-cryptoart-dao?referrer=0xc9ddb5e37165827bbbff15b582e232c06862c4e8
42 replies
17 recasts
103 reactions
m/branson
@mbranson
nice step forward max. well positioned. it’s a good to have a strong leadership hand, tho i wonder if in time will you cede ultimate veto power or bring in ~2 others to help with such decisions to form a board of sorts? 5000 $DEGEN for the leadership.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Thank you. It's not possible to let go of that ultimate veto power but I don't plan to exercise it except in emergencies like takeovers or mistakes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
m/branson
@mbranson
interesting. ‘not possible’ seems like antithetical to the mission and goals stated in your write up. i’d push on you to consider it in time, balancing power, even rarely leveraged power, is a worthwhile exercise.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Oh no I don't mean not possible in terms of the structure I've laid out, I mean it's not possible on chain to renounce my host privileges. Totally valid points you're making.
2 replies
1 recast
0 reaction
m/branson
@mbranson
got it. thanks for clarifying. so it’s a partydao onchain capability issue vs a /cryptoart dao mechanic desire. makes more sense.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Exactly. I think as host of /cryptoart it's important that I reserve this ability, for moderation purposes. Like most other members probably aren't going to go read the smart contracts for the proposals people are submitting. I will. Like the channel itself, I will flex my authority only when really necessary.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
