Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
What I want to believe: web3 enables alignment between social app devs and users, so that the UX can be optimized for wellness rather than addiction. What I suspect: in the presence of apps designed with addiction in mind, wellness oriented designs will be outcompeted.
6 replies
2 recasts
26 reactions
Mac Budkowski 🥝 @ FarCon
@macbudkowski
I think most people will keep using addiction-inducing apps. But at least people will have a choice and those who prefer wellness-centric apps will be able to use them w/o compromising on the social graph. Kind of like with food - most people eat garbage but at lest you have restaurants where you can eat healthy food.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Gökhan Turhan 🧬💾🚀
@gokhan.eth
hence will be more valuable to power users, some of whom are also based investors and VCs, the people like us will always find those.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
h=ncollector
@hencollector
unfortunately tipping you because I think you may be spot on 😭 500 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CStreet.eth
@cstreet
I would hope designers/builders for the web3 space would build opt out versions/functionality that a corporation would normally not allow. Comes down to who’s footing the bill. VCs will replicate addictive design to increase roi, sadly.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth ∈SF
@eulerlagrange.eth
The nice thing about all th messages being stored in hubs is we can have free open source client that is for light browsing. But people still have to choose to use it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
parseb
@parseb.eth
50 $degen . but no. UIs over open protocols might compete not on their addictiveness but on how much value add and hassle free are. Flight to 0 context switching.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
