keccers
@keccers.eth
Bryan Johnson has been proactively trying to get ahead of this NYT piece — it’s here It says that Bryan is extremely controlling of his employees and wields this control through extraordinary confidentiality agreements I don’t expect a ton of sympathy for the worker here. I understand how you could have a positive perspective on these agreements. It is an individual’s choice whether or not to work for Bryan. BUT — the piece also suggests there may be more than meets the eye to the protocol, which many follow. Bryan’s medical advisor featured in the Netflix documentary, resigned over concerns related to the protocol. In Bryan’s own study of 1700 people, many people had adverse effects when following Blueprint. When Bryan reported on the work, he released data on only 300 participants Blueprint clearly works for many if not all and I’m not trying to tell you to stop eating nutty pudding. But be judicious in the advice you take. Don’t be a blind follower Unlocked gift link in reply 👇
4 replies
3 recasts
25 reactions
Matt
@mattlee
I don’t want to be a hater but is it just me or is this really badly written? It seems like college freshman level to me. Also describing the pursuit of everlasting youth as an “oddball fascination” is one of the craziest things I’ve ever read haha
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
I think you’re being a LITTLE harsh on the writing quality, especially considering the low level of literacy among most. I am always willing to be generous as I know there needs to be a dumbing down when you write mass My primary feedback is that it’s trying to do too much. It wants to address every allegation — the confidentiality agreements, the issues with the protocol, and Bryan’s past with his ex — and kind of gets a little jittery trying to thread these things together
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
