Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
frame devs: what do you prefer about the frames.js frame debugger over the warpcast debugger?
7 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
matt ðŸ’
@matthewmorek
warpcast debugger: - is wonky - loses all my input on reload (unlike Warpcast mobile) - it doesn't debug anything, just launches a frame - throws errors on SDK interactions (add frame) instead of helping me debug them (success/failure) - it's necessary evil since it's the only way to simulate FC connection what I'd like as a developer: - support debugging SDK interactions - save my input to local storage, so I don't have to re-type it each time - output extra Warpcast-specific stuff to console: auth, connection, interactions, etc - output some basic stats (time to auth, etc) oh, and above all: fix timeout when trying to fetch frame embedding
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
great feedback, thanks
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
matt ðŸ’
@matthewmorek
even better, allow SDK to simulate connection in dev for a given FID and we can do away with this whole tunneling thing altogether, as it's a big obstacle
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction