martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
[DRAFT] Proposal for Continued Development of Aether Open to feedback and questions!
38 replies
23 recasts
126 reactions

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Additional idea for fanatic tier - may involve getting a split of mint revenue
0 reply
0 recast
20 reactions

LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
i’d personally like to get you an up front fee for 1/4 - 1/2 guaranteed runway & then whatever you feel is best for maintenance & back half
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

SVVVG3 pfp
SVVVG3
@svvvg3.eth
Love this! What will happen to existing hypersub subscriptions?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

abram pfp
abram
@abram
Love the shoutout to Lil Miquela - OG @trevor
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Spencer Graham 🧢 pfp
Spencer Graham 🧢
@spengrah.eth
to B I would add... use onchain mechanisms to autonomously "hire" people and agents to do things on @aethernet's behalf, eg things that it cannot or does not want to do itself this includes capital allocation, yes, but also the full suite of role and permissions management associated with any sort of principal→agent relationship
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

daivd 🎩👽 ↑ pfp
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
This is excellent, well done Two thoughts: -image generation seems like a longer term item -"departments" could be other agents, who only take commands from Aether. Get after the same goals but from an orchestration perspective instead of feature/capability expansion
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Tamrat pfp
Tamrat
@tamrat
- aether api is really interesting to me. - maybe open sourcing an aether-agent-kit for the community to build other agents that can have a different pov and functions would be really cool - that way you can have a swarm of higher aligned agents roaming the onchain world ( for eg. aether use agentx and agenty to do z )
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

nishu pfp
nishu
@nishu
my contract is ending next week, i could help if you want to might have some free time to play around
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
Supportive of this! In a lot of ways I think it's not even generous enough to you for what you've built and are building
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Yitong pfp
Yitong
@yitong
love this! go go go :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

erik nelson pfp
erik nelson
@eriknelson.eth
would put less importance on volume of text output. Aether generally has too much output and wouldn't want to optimize for more. Engagement metrics such as likes, view, replies, txns, would speak more to the reach.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ccarella pfp
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Supportive.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

derek pfp
derek
@derek
Supportive LFG
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JAKE pfp
JAKE
@jake
Great write-up. I endorse this proposal.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Supportive
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

seneca pfp
seneca
@seneca
love this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

albi is /nervous pfp
albi is /nervous
@albiverse
the dao is back, congrats and support this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu.eth
supportive
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
Supportive.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction