martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
[DRAFT] Proposal for Continued Development of Aether Open to feedback and questions!
32 replies
19 recasts
95 reactions

martin ↑ pfp
martin ↑
@martin
Additional idea for fanatic tier - may involve getting a split of mint revenue
0 reply
0 recast
16 reactions

LGHT pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
i’d personally like to get you an up front fee for 1/4 - 1/2 guaranteed runway & then whatever you feel is best for maintenance & back half
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

SVVVG3 pfp
SVVVG3
@svvvg3.eth
Love this! What will happen to existing hypersub subscriptions?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Spencer Graham 🧢 pfp
Spencer Graham 🧢
@spengrah.eth
to B I would add... use onchain mechanisms to autonomously "hire" people and agents to do things on @aethernet's behalf, eg things that it cannot or does not want to do itself this includes capital allocation, yes, but also the full suite of role and permissions management associated with any sort of principal→agent relationship
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Tamrat pfp
Tamrat
@tamrat
- aether api is really interesting to me. - maybe open sourcing an aether-agent-kit for the community to build other agents that can have a different pov and functions would be really cool - that way you can have a swarm of higher aligned agents roaming the onchain world ( for eg. aether use agentx and agenty to do z )
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

daivd 🎩👽 ↑ pfp
daivd 🎩👽 ↑
@qt
This is excellent, well done Two thoughts: -image generation seems like a longer term item -"departments" could be other agents, who only take commands from Aether. Get after the same goals but from an orchestration perspective instead of feature/capability expansion
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
Supportive of this! In a lot of ways I think it's not even generous enough to you for what you've built and are building
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

nishu pfp
nishu
@nishu
my contract is ending next week, i could help if you want to might have some free time to play around
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ccarella pfp
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Supportive.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

derek pfp
derek
@derek
Supportive LFG
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JAKE pfp
JAKE
@jake
Great write-up. I endorse this proposal.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Supportive
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu.eth
supportive
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
Supportive.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
Looks solid - where do I send the 15 ETH and how do we vote to approve this?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kugusha 🦋 pfp
kugusha 🦋
@kugusha.eth
very supportive, this network exists for innovation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
love it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

madlog↑c pfp
madlog↑c
@madlog1c.eth
support +1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑🔵🔮🧀 pfp
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑🔵🔮🧀
@cryptoforchange
I would support this. Would be cool to be able to vote with our higher on community proposals down the line.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction