Every media site (WSJ, NYT, Bloomberg etc.) should have some kind of a 0-100 trust score that tells you how many fake reports they made and it should be visible in your browser so you can check their reputation.

It's insane the world spends more energy rating Uber drivers than media outlets.

Building @kiwi 
Writing @ https://kanfa.macbudkowski.com/

The “job to be done” for media in 2023 is outrage and NYT & WSJ are delivering the product the people want

Head of Institutional Growth at /solana Foundation. /wine host 🍷 nick.vc Anyone can cook. 

I know that's their strategy but when we look at the most popular YouTubers and podcasters, they get into much more nuance than the mainstream media. 

So maybe there's another way but betting on outrage is just the easiest thing to do

gigameshmusic.com

Farther: https://paragraph.xyz/@farther/the-next-chapter

Agree. I'm pretty sure Rogan is a much worse source of info than BBC since "Jaime look that up" fact-checking strategy isn't too efficient compared to the team of journalists :)

My point was more that Rogan is not selling outrage, he's actually a place for a long, nuanced conversation.

I think if there was a truly credibly neutral rating system, it would show  independent media is on par with msm, at best.

Ex: I would bet the farm Rogan is a worse source of info than NPR, BBC, AP.