Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yesyes
@yesyes
Boost runs out soon so casting out a loosely held opinion- - I think artists are reasonable to be concerned about AI being trained on their works. > "But AIs learn art the same way humans do!" - yes, the methods could be considered similar but the distribution of that learned AI skill is not at all similar. When an artist released an artwork, they were fully expecting many people to learn from their work then further pass down those skills but they definitely weren't expecting that their skills would become this easily accessible through AI. Scale matters
5 replies
0 recast
54 reactions
Mabiruna
@mabiruna
As artist I would add to @eggman.eth reply, that me and lots of my colleagues in enterprise companies see ai as potential tool. You can create references for color palettes and see how this would look or push own brain to research through using ai as inspiration much faster than, say, Pinterest. Some major artists I know use ai to make variations of their own concepts a little. When they already drew something but ai suggests "add here little golden splash" and it looks nice. I know studio who has their leader art style Lora and use it to aibash junior artists props a little to match the style of project. Allows to hire juniors with less demands to fit the style of any project and help them learn faster on their own arts example. So some artists are even up for training ai model on themselves. Truth is... Model trained on someone else, specific, is more of a toy. It's hyped now, but I can't see it as a problem in future. Ppl can create samdoesarts model. But samdoesarts artist value is not in this. But in him
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
yesyes
@yesyes
Interesting. This comment is more insightful than most posts i've seen on twitter. Thanks for the reply
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
