Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
after the Lex x Beff pod, i am more skeptical of than persuaded by e/acc: -URL vibes are 1000% hyper masculine, but the IRL vibes areβ¦ not, to put it bluntly -the sense it was started as satire, unexpectedly took off w/o a strong foundation, and now theyβve doubled down due to sunk cost fallacy any counters? SOS
30 replies
13 recasts
68 reactions
π _π£π _π
@m-j-r
https://twitter.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1739794075757289840 is a decent point. as always, satoshi's rebuttal seems appropriate. e/acc is just a meme that policymaking is clearly unwise & many will continue to embrace risk/act freely b/c this is the healthy way to achieve security. Bazaar >>> Cathedral
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
policy making is βunwiseβ yet the wisest people in crypto (Coinbase) are actively asking for policy and engaging in policy making. letβs be practical and pragmatic here.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π _π£π _π
@m-j-r
practically, pragmatically, has coinbase advocated for these policies unimpeachibly, or is there credible dissent? the point still stands that there is no certainty to this approach & others can choose other paths w/ other risks. I wouldn't call any party the wisest. coinbase folks are intelligent (from my POV)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
fair point. i think thereβs a middle ground (that leans closer to e/acc) where safety is incorporated to a small degree, instead of disregarded entirely. which would be more likely to succeed?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π _π£π _π
@m-j-r
safety is absolutely critical, and per that "policy is unwise" tweet, it may require significantly more data on the edge, not more coherency. historically & capitalistically, this may be likelier to succeed. nobody's disregarding the entire concept, but many deeply chafe against one sacrosanct approach.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
