Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
I claimed a bunch of Moxie token over the past few days – this appears to have accumulated organically as a result of my casts and interactions. I cannot tell what the mechanism is by which this occurs but it seems to be that when certain people respond to you it generates a lot of Moxie, whereas others do not. So you may have a trending and popular post but if the more powerful accounts don't engage with it there is not much Moxie generated. I think it would be more democratic and come closer to achieving organic economic viability if the mechanism were more based on engagement agnostically rather than favoring certain accounts. At least the favoritism should not be so wildly disproportionate and can allow for posts enjoyed by lowbies to generate rewards rather than building around a few power users.
37 replies
14 recasts
98 reactions
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r.eth
agreed, but this is where crypto-enabled strangers say "no, u". if we try 1 vote systems, the complexity of preventing sybil attacks runs away from the initial intent to crowdmeasure rhetorical/memetic power. collusion resistance is also complex/undiscovered. I think @vitalik.eth 's "Trust Models" (ipfs://bafybeich5qo7pzecsojkrlgr6wcbzc4gh3gbluwrnr2wglbekihvgon7ma/general/2020/08/20/trust.html) lays out the compelling case for certain techniques & the kind of discretion for applying them. as far as Moxie, I do agree that the signal could be improved, but I honestly don't see how that can work w/ moderated "focus groupchat multisig", repeated so many times that conspicuous collusion can be appropriately weighted. and that costs bandwidth. eventually we'll coalesce into meso-bodies to meet halfway.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
