justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
i'm sure it's been talked about many times over already in /warpcast, but if you'd humor me, is there a reason why a channel `member` doesn't necessarily have to be a channel `follower`? i get why there can be a distinction between `member` and `follower`, but shouldn't a `member` have to be a `follower`? cc @luso
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Luso
@luso
An even better question: In the following context, what would be your preferred outcome? a) You drop to all users which are members AND followers of the channel b) You drop to all users which are members OR followers OR both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
