Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
The main Ethereum upgrade since the Merge is on its way: Dencun hard fork bringing EIP-4844 (Proto-Danksharding) will be there on March 13th aiming at making L2 transactions cheaper. What impact will it have? Which L2 will win the fee war? 2/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
Methodology: 1) Consists of evaluating transaction costs across various L2s (Starknet, ZkSync, Optimism, Scroll, and Arbitrum) comparing average DA to execution costs in % 2) Then project those costs into 3 scenarios of new DA cost post 4844 (pessimistic, moderate & DA=0) 3/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
This analysis includes transactions of all types (transfer, swap, multicall...) (Collecting the exact same & consistent source of data across each L2 was very challenging. Thus we will consider the data we had access to for each L2s.) Now, let's get started 🏁 4/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
- @Starknet The attached graph reveals that DA costs currently represent about 90% of total costs, with execution making up the remaining 10%. The green and red part shows the average DA cost on L1 (pre EIP-4844) and the purple strip represents the execution cost in %. 5/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
- @ZkSync The attached graph indicates average DA costs at around 65%, with execution costs at 35%. -despite some meaningful peaks-. 6/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
- @Scroll Scroll exp (scrollscan.com) suggests DA costs average 62-63% for swap/multicall & 90% for transfers. We approximate an average DA cost of 70%. Without weighting the weight of each type of tx, we'll consider an average DA cost of 70% (vs 30% for exec) 7/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
- @Optimism (OP Stack) According to their March 3rd article, OP claims a x70 decrease in tx fees post 4844, based on their "Superchain Savings Estimator" (SSE). However, the exact method used justifying it isn't detailed. We gotta rely on this data for now & wait for 4844 8/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
- @arbitrum Unfortunately, couldn't get data to compare the weight of the DA to the execution cost so we won't be able to include them in this analysis. Offchain Labs published a great article about it https://medium.com/offchainlabs/eip-4844-what-does-it-mean-for-l2-users-5e86ebc4c028 9/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
Ok now that we have the average cost of DA vs the execution cost for the L2s let's consider three scenarios post EIP-4844 to measure the impact on the price for each L2s 1) Pessimistic scenario 2) Moderate scenario 3) Extreme scenario: DA = 0 10/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Louthing pfp
Louthing
@louthing
1) If the DA cost drops to 50%, the overall tx fee would decrease by: - Starknet: x1.8 (with overall cost of 55% of current levels) - Scroll: x1.5 (with overall cost of 65% of current levels) - Zksync: x1.5 (with overall cost of 67.5% of current levels) - Arbitrum: N/A 11/16
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction