Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
since apparently the "build another client, not a priority rn, doesn't drive long term growth, etc" is the default response here (despite the general sense that channels are a rushed, underexplored feature (potential new primitive) where the lack of prioritization and thoughtfulness has led to increased friction and a worse NUX) is anyone building a channel-focused client? i'm incredibly excited about the promise of channels and promise to dedicate a portion of my time, energy, and resources to exploring this with you and supporting you i am a force of nature, as some of you may know, especially when i'm motivated by both the mission and someone telling me i'm wrong
42 replies
12 recasts
171 reactions
nis.eth
@literature
Hard to build a channel-focused client when channels aren't part of the protocol or there's no APIs!
4 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
would you like that to change?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Petra ⊙
@0xpetra
How does Supercast get channel data then? 🤔 @woj.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ST
@vercelabloh
ah.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rob Zombie
@heegs
This is the correct answer, unfortunately.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction