july

Working through a mental model rn

1. Good content is harder to make than bad or stolen content

2. Given a quantity incentive w/o quality penalty, bad content will always proliferate faster

3. Quality is group specific and really hard to measure

So until you know what your group loves, rewards accelerate bad actors?

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /creators and /cameron. dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Sounds reasonable

But if you have “bad” content that proliferates faster than other “bad content”

Does that make it more good or more bad

I’m assuming “bad” content is a subset of “bad content” so in that case it would make it more bad

but if there is “bad” content that is actually “good content” like deep fried memes or w/e then it’d be more good

Bad is prob a red herring here and the better MM is “content your group likes” tho