Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
This is an extremely powerful statement imo. How do you feel about it? https://i.imgur.com/kdsXHYx.jpg
17 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Absolutely love the diversity of thought here, pointing at different things. Farcaster is far more diverse than I originally thought.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ace pfp
ace
@ace
the ratio btw creators/consumers will likely not change imo. one way i think of it though is to redefine the definition of “creators” more people “curate” than create, so our thesis with @perl is to create a place where bigger subset of consumers become “creators” by curating first.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
@dwr.eth did it first https://i.imgur.com/EhU6jn6.jpg
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Mashal pfp
Mashal
@mashal
It’s powerful, and I understand the need to add to public voice. BUT lurkers are imp and I feel like most folks look at + prioritize the wrong metrics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
Further, if you have to beg a population to indulge you, then any change won't be lasting enough to make a difference. Or the wrong people will take the bait, further skewing the pretend dialog in a direction that alienates the other sides. Good leaders can unify people rhetorically. This won't be that. Ever.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
Asking lurkers to stop lurking requires an incentive. Eon wants Twitter to be a "public dialog" platform, but it isn't. It's a one-sided-opinion-projection platform. And that's what the lurkers are there for - to receive, not engage.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ace pfp
ace
@ace
@perl #curation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kipit pfp
Kipit
@kipit
It’s pretty much internet rule honestly. 1% create content, 9% engage with it, 90% lurk!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Renee Bigelow pfp
Renee Bigelow
@reneeb
Honestly like he just discovered the 1/9/90 rule, and it is his 1 man attempt to negate it now that it’s in his interest to do so.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arthur pfp
Arthur
@conft
Actually engagement boosts for new users may help. Mostly it’s difficult to start due to low engagement
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg pfp
Greg
@giga
consuming content and not creating is a losing game on many fronts. consumption becomes marginal and noisey. creation leads to a brand, network, and validation/invalidation of thoughts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
chet pfp
chet
@cosmicblend
not enough people actually want to talk and explore topics, ideas, etc. most just post for the thinkfluencer stat machine
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sterling pfp
Sterling
@sterling
They are in desperate need of additional ad inventory and have a big bot problem Cynical, I know
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Seems like the first statement I’ve seen from him an awhile that wasn’t some honey trap
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/ It's just a human nature thing. You can't change the humans, you can only change the product. Asking people to change won't help, changing the product might.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
gae pfp
gae
@gae
But with no followers, you become a reply guy ... There is a barrier to entry, and you may just get enough value out of lurking.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bitsikka pfp
bitsikka
@bitsikka.eth
Pareto distribution or "80-20" rule stating that 80% of outcomes are due to 20% of causes, a pattern observed in natural phenomena and social activities - could be at play. 🤷🏻‍♂️ Thus, it could be expected that 20% of tweeters/casters are responsible for all tweets/casts. 80% just consumes them. :)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction