Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
What do you consider your phone number to be? Anon, pseudo, or full-id? What would classify as full-id (aka kyc)?
21 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
Thank you for these responses. Gives a lot to think about. I see phone # as full-id too. Noodling how the data is siloed (across entire telco network and +), phone numbers may hold same keys as anon->pseudo->full-I’d, when interacting between diff networks, with bridges. Not much diff than web3 rn. Dunno. Thinkin
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
FULL-ID in india phone numbers are attached to a national id card (aadhar card).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matt Galligan pfp
Matt Galligan
@mg
My primary is full-id for sure. It’s treated as compromised and untrustworthy for security but still valuable for communication. I have a few others that are for different purposes on a spectrum of anon or pseudo.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jordan Kutzer pfp
Jordan Kutzer
@jk
Full-id. But not full engagement. I consider FaceTime video/audio and iMessage to be full-id and full engagement.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Pseudo, if standalone. I’ve come from KYC, with all the metadata it is literally a full-id.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rhys pfp
rhys
@rhys
@perl #thoughts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sam carter | 현춘 pfp
sam carter | 현춘
@samhcarter
Full ID if given to an individual, pseudo if for an app/company, somewhere in between as an email sign-off (listed to encourage network effect — and if I’m emailing you, I’d probably respond to a text or voicemail from you, anyway).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
full ID
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed O'Shaughnessy pfp
Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
Public, since the teleco got hacked recently! Full id is probably my browser fingerprint 😬
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩 pfp
𝚣𝚘𝚣 🎩
@zoz.eth
Full Id. Stored in a gov db
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🪷 pfp
🪷
@pdr
One is full-id as I’ve had the number since early 2000s Others are pseudo to anon
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adrian pfp
Adrian
@maurerbot
Full id. I would love to see private key based phone numbers as a destination node routed by disposable traditional phone numbers
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eugenijus Radlinskas pfp
Eugenijus Radlinskas
@eugenijus
My phone number is quite literally my ID. The SIM card has a KYCed multi-PIN protected hardware private key in it that is used as a Qualified Electronic Signature. Meaning it can be used to sign in to government services, banks and even sign legally binding agreements like founding a company or getting a mortgage.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
I consider my phone number to be one of two universal addresses I can give to almost anyone and know they will be able to reach me. (The other is an email address.) It's full-id for most today. We (3num.co) are making a pseudonymous one you can mint as an NFT.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Victor Ma 🧾 pfp
Victor Ma 🧾
@vm
full-id, so people need burners
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sophie pfp
Sophie
@sophie
Phone number is full-id because it can easily be traced back to you, but this is only because it used to be a unique and useful identifier. If it weren’t for existing databases of it, I’d say phone number is much less intrusive than name/social media/age
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo Chen pfp
Leo Chen
@leochen
Phone number is fully KYC’ed I assume in most cases
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
crypt0disc0 pfp
crypt0disc0
@crypt0disc0
sadly full id. always have a burner
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
maxgrok pfp
maxgrok
@maxgrok
Pro tip: metropcs doesn’t check ids on using their month to month plan. Never had a problem. Semi-Id?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction