Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Les Greys
@les
Does anyone ever talk about the low vs. high energy of the internal team's startup chatter? I don't mean hype, I mean simply communication e.g. feels draggy, responses are low effort, long, distracts etc. obvi red flags but more so wondering if anything is out there in terms of the 'hype exec' vs 'ship exec' vs 'idk exec' etc.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
to me communication is the only way to express anything. In the end it's a means to an end. In a startup that end should be to be the best at what you set out to do. For that one needs to 1) Communicate to be aligned on what the thing is you set out to do 2) What it means to be the best 3) How to approach it 4) The rules of engagement (e.g. how the startup operates, "moves") if you take these 4 basic understandings that need to be communicated, then the communication itself needs to match the answers and inteded answers by the founders 1) personal opinion 2) opinion as a group of founders if multiple Applying this to a sample startup with a "hype exec" would look like "oh yeah we're taking over the world, we'll be this big bla bla" but then lack communicating "how to approach it". That mostly falls short, if the exec communicates the how as well the hype exec could be very well suited. Same for the other communication types you mentioned. the means of communicating shall align with the goals + actions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Freytrades🎩📈
@freymon.eth
bookmarked i’d love to see get back and see the responses.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
