I can’t get over how bad the feed on Threads is.

Makes me realize how amazing early Farcaster TL was, feed was slow, consisted of high-signal content, giving me repeated exposure of same thoughts, gave me an opportunity to sit with information.

This is where all SM falters, except Farcaster clients.

product leader @walmart • leading AI/ML initiatives in the retail space • former submariner/nuclear engineer • tech, AI, general aviation 

Network size impacts an algo feed but not a “following” feed, which is what Warpcast has today w/ Farcaster user base. 

Design impacts both, an algo feed Vs a following feed. 

Threads made a design choice to feed content of massive follower base vs. only who I follow. 

Both can be good if designed well.

I’m not on Threads yet so no direct experience, but how much of the difference you’re describing do you attribute to the size (and therefore average quality) of the user base vs design decisions?

I like the feed, following a lot of devs there