Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/anoncast
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pastel ← DENVER ꓽꓽ) pfp
pastel ← DENVER ꓽꓽ)
@leopastel
to launch a token through @anonfun costs $65,000 lol otherwise you can “suggest” a token to @rawanon and hope a whale pushes it to the main feed using ZK to anonymously launch tokens has a ton of potential, it would benefit everyone involved if it was more accessible
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Toady Hawk pfp
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Anoncast dev Slokh is building community curation, so this is a stopgap measure, but it’s better than the alternative of spam-maxxing. Also there’s definitely a good core of people with skin in the game watching the feed to promote good casts and tokens, pretty sure bangers will get promoted easily
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

matthew chaim pfp
matthew chaim
@chaim.eth
lol as it becomes ridiculously easy to launch a token on base, kinda fire to see a token launcher that costs 65k to launch one hahah
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Bushi pfp
Bushi
@bushi7
They will change it if they want to see the price to rise, prob they did such a move to make the price go lower and buy. They know they have a good product and I bet they're going to release some good new between now and 4 and 9 december
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

FOMOphoria pfp
FOMOphoria
@basefreakz
I believe anoncast will keep anoncast and anonfun separate with the requirement for both tokens. Let's remember, the devs receive royalties for both anon and anonfun tokens and so it's in their interest to utilise the tokens. This also ensures high quality clankers are released via anonfun. You have to see the bigger picture here, its genius.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction