Moxie doesn't reward content based on quality

It simply provides a few hundred accounts disproportionate power to distribute the token based on the accounts with which they engage https://warpcast.com/0xt0ny/0x60e6fee3

Sometimes that power happens to reward (objectively) quality content (e.g. @mazmhussain)

But to say Moxie's design rewards the highest quality content simply isn't accurate

2+ weeks into Moxie.. seems about the right time to resurface this one

2+ weeks into Moxie.. seems about the right time to resurface this one https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0x8dc6751c

in a social network people with more influence play an important role of curating content for people with less influence

the moxie model currently rewards this curation, by enabling those with more influence to pay it forward to those with less

it's working as designed thus far

and we'll continue to make it better and better! 

check out the farscores and farranks of these solid earners today

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

chef at moxie.xyz | Moxie is your onchain AI assistant—analyzing transactions, unlocking social alpha, and executing trades on your behalf.

Adjustments need to be made or at least the most influential ones need to do so, the idea of this is to decentralize the curation, divide the influence as many channels exist in Warpcast and its clients.

The role of influencers is important, but, you have to be aware of how the protocol works, I am new and I have barely earned a few Moxie, the problem is, in what way the curators look for content or what is quality for them? You have to know the criteria.