links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
There’s a lot of criticism on Merkle right now for channel transfers. I wanted to provide another perspective as a community builder. When building community, especially early, you need to focus on attracting and retaining people who ACT - provide content, engage, etc. You also need to make these people feel good so they stick around. When negative people arrive and start taking up space, they can crowd out good actors with their demands, vibes, and derailing. As a community builder, you must prioritize your good actors over the bad, EVEN AT THE EXPENSE OF PERCEIVED FAIRNESS. If you don’t, you risk bad actors driving the good ones away, and ending up with nothing. It’s actually a shitty job - no matter what you do people will complain. Good community builders must have the courage to be disliked.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Leeward Bound pfp
Leeward Bound
@leewardbound
all of this is true but at the same time it seems kinda like writing them a pass, this isn't the first time they've caught flak for having a lukewarm commitment to decentralization and failing to embody eth's ethos (while reaping the benefits of larping it)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

links 🏴 pfp
links 🏴
@links
“Commitment to decentralization” is such a vague statement, and if you really wanted ”full decentralization” you’d likely want to use another network like Lens. Farcaster is about “sufficient decentralization”, and the result is a rapidly iterable product and (imho) superior UX compared to Lens. All this to say that product devs have to choose what they are actually decentralizing, it’s not a catch-all term. Anyone can accuse anything of not being decentralized enough. I also had an issue with their choices around channels before they were permissionless (they gave one I was asking for to someone else), but as a user I accepted it and continued to use Farcaster because I feel it is better than alternatives.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction