2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
no offense to you sir but this seems grossly incorrect to me
solana is most certainly a garbage centralized L1 where your security and funds and censorship resistance are all directly dependent on a dozen physical servers and the validator cabal that runs them. they can-and-do rollback the chain at any time, it regularly crashes and halts, and as an L1, that's authoritative; user funds are at risk every time the team takes a shit without wiping.
im no cb fanboy but the difference is night and day with base - there's still 1 team running aws servers, but as an L2 roll up, a) my security doesn't depend on this team, they can't forge transactions or alter balances, b) my funds on base can't be touched by the base team, they can't rollback the chain, and c) even if they decide to censor me, roll up architecture guarantees a force-exit mechanism so i can withdraw my funds interacting directly with L1 3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ethereans are loyal to etheruem because ethereum is the only chain that actually deserves anyone's loyalty. btc and eth are the only credibly neutral, truly decentralized, client diverse, and btc made the concious decision not to perform any upgrades, so eth is the only blockchain for builders.
re: "base is not as decentralized as we are lead to believe" - i dont think we are lead to believe it's super decentralized, L2 rollup architecture is public knowledge, many centralized actors are building L2 and L3 chains, and thanks to the security inheritance from L1 the "decentralization" of the L2 is not really of critical concern. base doesn't *need* to be decentralized, solana does.
i guess i'm a little skeptical of how you paint pro-ethereum-bias as a detriment. to me, ethereans are simply smart people who can recognize the difference between promising and novel technology, and larping unserious grift. solana is larping unserious grift. bias is good actually. 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
