Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

yv pfp
yv
@lean
Can anyone pitch a convincing argument in favor of this
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

yv pfp
yv
@lean
To clarify, I mean, in favor of @dwr.eth taking vanity channel away by force from @ksensei
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
This is not a Bankless issue, it's the rules we had around squatting.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Kristi Klaudy pfp
Kristi Klaudy
@klaudy
I think creating a channel under someone else's brand is never a good idea. I made the argument earlier here, but if I create a blockchain called Google, I think that I would get myself into troubles and would need to rename it sooner or later. Brands are property which should be honored in crypto space as well imo.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Bitcoin For Families pfp
Bitcoin For Families
@btcforfamilies
Yes, it's hilarious that any Defi-ers are defending a "copyright" to a channel using a very basic word. Suck it up and pay what they want, or use "banklessofficial" just like everyone else did. Either we are in a free market, or we aren't. Amazing there is even an argument about this in decentralized world. 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction