Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LauNaMu
@launamu
Thoughts? What if we experimented on proactive grants with prediction markets? Could this help us aggregate better data to make decisions on how to allocate funds to future outcomes for public goods? Is someone already doing this? If that’s you share your program below! 👇🏽Or send me a dm!📩
6 replies
4 recasts
14 reactions
LauNaMu
@launamu
Important note: The outcome over which people should be betting is not whether a team will or won’t get a grant, but whether they will deliver all milestones and outcomes described in their proposal. And yes, the goal would be for people to be able to make money betting on this.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
LauNaMu
@launamu
This would be a very interesting way to bring other information sources to the decision making process for PROACTIVE grants based on information others have but might not be otherwise incentivized to share (people could even participate anonymously).
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Octant ⧫
@octant
You should talk to @abundance
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nico Gallardo 🍄
@nicnode
@rev @cjh
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
Vitalik wrote about it but the harsh reality is it won't work. optimism rpgf has made is clear that when $$ is involved, defination of public goods could be changed just to fulfill your bias. Years of research and literature clearly defines what public goods are.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Chris Carella
@ccarella
This would be a worthy experiment. Could even try it at a small scale.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
