Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

L pfp
L
@lajos
Do you often use ChatGPT for coding? Maybe it's my prompting skill that are lacking, but to me it feels like a super weak junior dev
13 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

moritz 💧🔑 pfp
moritz 💧🔑
@moritz
I use it quite a bit for things that are (1) widespread (= it has a lot of data about it) and (2) I'm not super familiar with Faster to kickstart things than going through docs / stackoverflow
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I am a windows plebe and it lets me fly through Linux stuff effortlessly The cross language barrier for anything well documented I think is getting smashed quickly
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Paul Dowman 🔴✨ pfp
Paul Dowman 🔴✨
@pauldowman.eth
Daily. It’s great at certain things, like regexes or when you don’t know an API but want to do something quickly without digging through docs (as long as it’s a common API). Or shell scripts. Think of it as a junior helper who is an absolute savant at doing common but tricky things very quickly.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
I use it for single library specific bugs, but it seems to fail exponentially the more complexity you add and confidently makes stuff up.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sheldon Trotman pfp
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
Wow I’m happy you said this I thought it was just me. I get frustrated with certain responses then begrudgingly having to go back to google + reading the top links 🙃 Also pretty annoying sometimes when it’s blatantly wrong and I get another bug 🤦🏾‍♂️ has been a plus for small/popular things though
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
a lot it's strong at certain things, weak at others it has strong "horizontal knowledge": it knows some stuff about a lot of things gotta use it often to know its strength/weakness
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Yes, I use it a lot and it is extremely good at many things. But yes it is absolutely necessary that you prompt it well. You have to narrow down your problem a lot and paste in as much information as possible. Then it'll create amazing results, e.g. it is very capable of spelling out all test cases or frontend design.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dubpace pfp
Dubpace
@dubpace
ChatGPT is REALLY good at certain things that are tedious and time consuming E.g. it can quickly make a function using Swift’s DateFormatter class to transform a string in a particular format into Date object
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jackson 🎩🍖 pfp
Jackson 🎩🍖
@jacks0n
For translating data structures it’s amazing. Generates all the boilerplate to generalise an encoding/decoding. Very helpful for go
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gökhan Turhan pfp
Gökhan Turhan
@gokhan.eth
I am a fresh autodidact in coding and programming. When there was no ChatGPT, I was kind of struggling TBH even though I am an avid learner—because there are too niché Qs that might disincentivize the learning process, and it was never easy to find solutions or As to them in either tutorials or forums ⬇️
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

rocket pfp
rocket
@rocket
I’ve been uploading repos to the code interpreter and it has been a *major* help in adding features that have different plugins and dependency requirements
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

netop://ウエハ pfp
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
Absolutely, it’s great for writing regular expressions for me.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

IV pfp
IV
@trbiv
I use it all the time and it’s really not that great unless you give it a ton of information. I use copilot more but I often disable it because constant suggestions make me lose my train of thought.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction