Passkeys enable super fast, easy wallet creation but is that really the holy grail? A wallet should serve as a secure, reliable, and accessible identity.

It's led me to think more about something I'm calling "account durability"

? | via sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater associates. darpa. secdef. navy. dia | linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

will digest and come back to u. thank u for sharing.

could interaction cost be reduced to simply just “time”?

brittle and durable. is this security? what is user goal in choosing or doing brittle / durable? that may trigger another way to see this spectrum. even burnable addresses to super cold vault may apply here. 

then u have time / security = ux tradeoffs

wdyt

@accountless.eth would love your thoughts

I like this framing, though it feels like "user owned" is an important and omitted aspect.

Can an account be durable if its password is controlled by a third party? Feels like it fails the "reliable access" test since it can be yoinked by {third party} at any time.