July pfp
July
@july
At point is it legitimate for a certain government (state, city, municipal etc) to say a commodity or service (water, utilities etc) should be a right for all of its citizens? And provide the public utility as a monopoly? Will emerging network states / city states do the same?
13 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
at no point is it legitimate
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

typeof.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
typeof.eth πŸ”΅
@typeof.eth
You don’t think the government should provide any commodity or service? Are we talking like private roads and justice system? If so, then I’m curious what you think the government should do.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
call me crazy but i think markets might be a more efficient way to provide cheap goods and services at scale compared to government-run monopolies Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
Mostly agree, but some services are natural monopolies. In that circumstance I’d prefer the monopoly to be in the hands of the organisation that at least ostensibly represents everyone, rather than the explicitly self interested one. Perhaps DAOs have a role to play in this space in the future.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions