July
@july
At point is it legitimate for a certain government (state, city, municipal etc) to say a commodity or service (water, utilities etc) should be a right for all of its citizens? And provide the public utility as a monopoly? Will emerging network states / city states do the same?
13 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
at no point is it legitimate
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
typeof.eth π΅
@typeof.eth
You donβt think the government should provide any commodity or service? Are we talking like private roads and justice system? If so, then Iβm curious what you think the government should do.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
call me crazy but i think markets might be a more efficient way to provide cheap goods and services at scale compared to government-run monopolies Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
4 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
kripcat.eth π©
@kripcat.eth
Mostly agree, but some services are natural monopolies. In that circumstance Iβd prefer the monopoly to be in the hands of the organisation that at least ostensibly represents everyone, rather than the explicitly self interested one. Perhaps DAOs have a role to play in this space in the future.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions