Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
Curious to understand what DUNA solves that wouldn’t be solved with: * Remove the veto * Dissolve Nouns foundation * Further protocolize Nouns (e.g Vrbs streaming)
3 replies
1 recast
14 reactions

krel pfp
krel
@krel
its not clear who will inject money
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp
Spencer Perkins
@spencerperkins.eth
Not following, what do you mean?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
imo for any solution proposed, there needs to be a compelling argument for “whos actually putting money into nouns (at scale)” for duna path it gets significantly more probable for institutions to do so eg i love leightons idea of going full protocol but whos the customer?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬ pfp
Gami ‪⌐◨-◨‬
@gami
what would compel an institution to buy nouns?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

krel pfp
krel
@krel
signaling value imo its not a waterproof case but a decent one
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction