Ethereum

Is there a consensus on which account abstraction architecture will win (Safe vs ERC-6900)? The Safe team seems to be well respected, but ERC-6900  seems to have some advantages. What’s the latest on the debate? Or can both flourish without confusing users?

davidcann.eth, developer, EVMavericks #982, @orangedao, @purple

The Safe whitepaper talks about ERC-6900. Why is it Safe vs 6900?

This article indicates that they’re not compatible for module developers:

gm ٩(◕‿◕｡)۶ ekinci.xyz

currently crowdfunding https://farconnect.xyz/crowdfund/

This article indicates that they’re not compatible for module developers: https://mirror.xyz/konradkopp.eth/7Q3TrMFgx2VbZRKa7UEaisIMjimpMABiqGYo00T9egA

Yeah there's definitely some tensions between ERC-6900 and the Safe Module architecture at the moment - although how exactly 6900 will look is also quite indeterminate given that theres no reference implementation yet. 

Safe does talk about becoming compatible with 6900 if it gains adoption and becomes the favored ...

abstractooor @rhinestone • prev oxford and exited web2 founder

... standard for modular accounts, however right now they're focused on building around their existing architecture, which has some upsides like a potentially stricter separation of account from modules which leads to higher security. In my mind, long-term, these two approaches converge into the same standard