Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/negationgame
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick âď¸
@nor
https://paragraph.com/@ngi/capital
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
KMacđ âŠ
@kmacb.eth
Especially like the ending. Always was⌠As many of the actors roles are changed it becomes difficult to name them. An investor as a customer as a promoter as an adjacent builder etc Wondering if youâve landed on any new terms to describe the actors.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick âď¸
@nor
yeah interesting question, so far they're just called contributors or stakeholders I've also played with other terms. The key thing though is that contributors should get some upside in the ceration of the valuabel thing they've created
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
KMacđ âŠ
@kmacb.eth
100 You might be interested in revnets. There appears to be a fledgling category of ârevenue tokensâ projects align with some of what youâve written. revnet.eth.sucks/memo
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick âď¸
@nor
Maybe revnets would like to experiment with /negationgame as their governance layer instead of using token voting
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick âď¸
@nor
thank you for the note looking
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction