Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Apparently this is a controversial idea, Milestone based equity/comp > time based Yes, you’re going to need to adjust alignment when milestones adjust. You should be doing that anyway.
6 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
It’s my default. Hard to do for employments though since employee mentality often is „I just want X per month“
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
K
@kijijij
This is for Co-Founder / Equity strategy. I agree employees dont partake in directions and hence dont want to be associated with risk of achieving or not achieving milestones.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
I think it's more then just co-founder & equity. why is equity different from Cash Flow?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
K
@kijijij
Most orgs are not transparent about cash flow. Employees like stability, may be "bonus" is what you are looking for ? If Org does well then employees dos well. Employees must have some competition and career guideline to achieve the best. You seem to be thinking like a entrepreneur, but people you hire don't want to think about biz problems all the time.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
>people you hire don't want to think about biz problems all the time. they don't need to. if compensation along a project/milestone base with some base salary is laid out properly they'll check it off like levels in video games and all are aligned and doing well
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
