Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
kia
@kia
the /toe-spacer and @randomerror.eth phenomena provide a few insights: 1. creating environments where norms and taboos break releases fresh energy from existing qDAUs. 2. although OGs respond better to these emergent memes, there's actually nothing holding new users out from getting involved. many of them do. 3. memecoins haven't been cracked on Farcaster yet. creation/distribution mechanisms are suboptimal for this medium. we almost need our own meta. until the mechanisms are well understood, capital won't flow in. 4. content is in fact the main bottle neck to growth. @dwr.eth is right. (it's not marketing). 5. Farcaster is much more metamodernist than postmodernist than X for example (hate to sound academic but no better way of describing it).
6 replies
2 recasts
40 reactions
Jacob
@jrf
what does this mean? > "Farcaster is much more metamodernist than postmodernist than X"
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
behkod.base.eth
@behkod.eth
Can't agree more. esp on item 4. You can't rely on FC as your single go-to SN even on Crypto/Blockchain, yet. It barely covers subjects other than the Base layer & FC itself.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Θ·Δππ
@jenna
good wrap 2316 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rileybeans
@rileybeans
content is marketing π plus, excellent content creators don't just fall out of the sky
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BFG π©βπ±
@bfg
Content is always bottleneck and so is quality interactions β¦ you can onboard quality content creators with marketing thatβs not marketing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ese π³
@esss
/fairlaunch by @wagmi1337.eth could be a better way to get more people involved
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
