accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
“EOA key still needs to be stored” 😂 man. it’s hard having critical views of 7702 bc it’s so favored. it’s a band aid. and we need more folks talking ab it and holding us accountable.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom
@jxom
It doesn’t need to be “stored” though :)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
i’m excited to see solutions. “forgetting they key” is also weird to me. i know there is no ideal and all avenues have tradeoffs. i just want us to be able to say, ya we aren’t solving root causes and are just designing around eoa limitations.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jxom
@jxom
why is it weird? if it's a post-quantum concern, then the issue is orthogonal as majority of multisig & execution signers are not PQ safe right now.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom
@jxom
there are also proposal addressing PK deactivation: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/d96625a4dcbbe2572fa006f062bd02b4582eefd5/EIPS/eip-7851.md
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jxom
@jxom
sure we can easily upgrade signers on SCA to be PQ-safe, but this wouldn't suffice because everything else would be screwed, so we need a backwards compatible way to secure the vulnerable keys.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
it’s very simple for me: if i can’t rotate a secret i am wearing the same underwear every day. if i can’t manage my accounts together, i am just adding things on top to work around this limitation and making it worse. a smart account tied to an app forever? wild. a smart account dependent on a single key pair eoa? also wild. who would design that way on purpose? we need better key management to have better account management and i don’t think folks take this seriously. the DID world finally acknowledged non rotating is weak, and now has a spec u can rotate and revoke.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
