@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jxom  pfp
jxom
@jxom
It doesn’t need to be “stored” though :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jxom  pfp
jxom
@jxom
why is it weird? if it's a post-quantum concern, then the issue is orthogonal as majority of multisig & execution signers are not PQ safe right now.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

jxom  pfp
jxom
@jxom
there are also proposal addressing PK deactivation: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/d96625a4dcbbe2572fa006f062bd02b4582eefd5/EIPS/eip-7851.md
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jxom  pfp
jxom
@jxom
sure we can easily upgrade signers on SCA to be PQ-safe, but this wouldn't suffice because everything else would be screwed, so we need a backwards compatible way to secure the vulnerable keys.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction